↓ Skip to main content

Endosymbiotic bacteria in insects: guardians of the immune system?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endosymbiotic bacteria in insects: guardians of the immune system?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis Eleftherianos, Jaishri Atri, Julia Accetta, Julio C. Castillo

Abstract

Insects have evolved obligate, mutualistic interactions with bacteria without further transmission to other eukaryotic organisms. Such long-term obligate partnerships between insects and bacteria have a profound effect on various physiological functions of the host. Here we provide an overview of the effects of endosymbiotic bacteria on the insect immune system as well as on the immune response of insects to pathogenic infections. Potential mechanisms through which endosymbionts can affect the ability of their host to resist an infection are discussed in the light of recent findings. We finally point out unresolved questions for future research and speculate how the current knowledge can be employed to design and implement measures for the effective control of agricultural insect pests and vectors of diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 362 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 25%
Student > Master 65 17%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 186 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 5%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 74 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,503,730
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,630
of 14,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,018
of 284,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#111
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.