↓ Skip to main content

Echolocation by the harbour porpoise: life in coastal waters

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Echolocation by the harbour porpoise: life in coastal waters
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee A. Miller, Magnus Wahlberg

Abstract

The harbor porpoise is one of the smallest and most widely spread of all toothed whales. They are found abundantly in coastal waters all around the northern hemisphere. They are among the 11 species known to use high frequency sonar of relative narrow bandwidth. Their narrow biosonar beam helps isolate echoes from prey among those from unwanted items and noise. Obtaining echoes from small objects like net mesh, net floats, and small prey is facilitated by the very high peak frequency around 130 kHz with a wavelength of about 12 mm. We argue that such echolocation signals and narrow band auditory filters give the harbor porpoise a selective advantage in a coastal environment. Predation by killer whales and a minimum noise region in the ocean around 130 kHz may have provided selection pressures for using narrow bandwidth high frequency biosonar signals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Other 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 41%
Environmental Science 28 24%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#662,891
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#346
of 15,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,967
of 292,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.