↓ Skip to main content

Acute blood flow restricted exercise to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy: would it be efficacious?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute blood flow restricted exercise to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy: would it be efficacious?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy P. Loenneke, Robert S. Thiebaud, Takashi Abe, Igor G. Manfro, Pedro J. Marin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 18 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,308,781
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,981
of 13,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,122
of 280,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#95
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.