↓ Skip to main content

K+ channels and cell cycle progression in tumor cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
K+ channels and cell cycle progression in tumor cells
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Halima Ouadid-Ahidouch, Ahmed Ahidouch

Abstract

K(+) ions play a major role in many cellular processes. The deregulation of K(+) signaling is associated with a variety of diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, or diabetes. K(+) ions are important for setting the membrane potential, the driving force for Ca(2+) influx, and regulate volume of growing cells. Moreover, it is increasingly recognized that K(+) channels control cell proliferation through a novel signaling mechanisms triggered and modulated independently of ion fluxes. In cancer, aberrant expression, regulation and/or sublocalization of K(+) channels can alter the downstream signals that converge on the cell cycle machinery. Various K(+) channels are involved in cell cycle progression and are needed only at particular stages of the cell cycle. Consistent with this idea, the expression of Eag1 and HERG channels fluctuate along the cell cycle. Despite of acquired knowledge, our understanding of K(+) channels functioning in cancer cells requires further studies. These include identifying the molecular mechanisms controlling the cell cycle machinery. By understanding how K(+) channels regulate cell cycle progression in cancer cells, we will gain insights into how cancer cells subvert the need for K(+) signal and its downstream targets to proliferate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 29%
Student > Master 14 21%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Chemistry 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,307
of 13,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,774
of 280,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#243
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.