↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms regulating nutrition-dependent developmental plasticity through organ-specific effects in insects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms regulating nutrition-dependent developmental plasticity through organ-specific effects in insects
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Koyama, Cláudia C. Mendes, Christen K. Mirth

Abstract

Nutrition, via the insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IIS)/Target of Rapamycin (TOR) signaling pathway, can provide a strong molding force for determining animal size and shape. For instance, nutrition induces a disproportionate increase in the size of male horns in dung and rhinoceros beetles, or mandibles in staghorn or horned flour beetles, relative to body size. In these species, well-fed male larvae produce adults with greatly enlarged horns or mandibles, whereas males that are starved or poorly fed as larvae bear much more modest appendages. Changes in IIS/TOR signaling plays a key role in appendage development by regulating growth in the horn and mandible primordia. In contrast, changes in the IIS/TOR pathway produce minimal effects on the size of other adult structures, such as the male genitalia in fruit flies and dung beetles. The horn, mandible and genitalia illustrate that although all tissues are exposed to the same hormonal environment within the larval body, the extent to which insulin can induce growth is organ specific. In addition, the IIS/TOR pathway affects body size and shape by controlling production of metamorphic hormones important for regulating developmental timing, like the steroid molting hormone ecdysone and sesquiterpenoid hormone juvenile hormone. In this review, we discuss recent results from Drosophila and other insects that highlight mechanisms allowing tissues to differ in their sensitivity to IIS/TOR and the potential consequences of these differences on body size and shape.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 227 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 29%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 35 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 22%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,040,081
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,301
of 13,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,421
of 282,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#199
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.