↓ Skip to main content

Why should one normalize heart rate variability with respect to average heart rate

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why should one normalize heart rate variability with respect to average heart rate
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00306
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerzy Sacha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 101 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Psychology 15 14%
Sports and Recreations 13 13%
Computer Science 9 9%
Engineering 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,877,254
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,455
of 15,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,592
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#73
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.