↓ Skip to main content

Effects of exercise on cardiovascular performance in the elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of exercise on cardiovascular performance in the elderly
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2014.00051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Vigorito, Francesco Giallauria

Abstract

Progressive aging induces several structural and functional alterations in the cardiovascular system, among whom particularly important are a reduced number of myocardial cells and increased interstitial collagen fibers, which result in impaired left ventricular diastolic function. Even in the absence of cardiovascular disease, aging is strongly associated to a age-related reduced maximal aerobic capacity. This is due to a variety of physiological changes both at central and at peripheral level. Physical activity (PA) appears in general to have a positive effect on several health outcomes in the elderly. This review aims to illustrate the beneficial effects of exercise on the physiologic decline of cardiovascular performance occurring with age. Furthermore, it will be stressed also the positive effect of physical activity in elderly patients affected by cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure and hypertension, and multiple comorbidities which may significantly worse prognosis in this high risk population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 25%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 16%
Sports and Recreations 38 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 68 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,003,371
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,560
of 15,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,681
of 315,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#46
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.