You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of bright light treatment on psychomotor speed in athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2014.00184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mikko P. Tulppo, Heidi Jurvelin, Eka Roivainen, Juuso Nissilä, Arto J. Hautala, Antti M. Kiviniemi, Vesa J. Kiviniemi, Timo Takala |
| Abstract |
A recent study suggests that transcranial brain targeted light treatment via ear canals may have physiological effects on brain function studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques in humans. We tested the hypothesis that bright light treatment could improve psychomotor speed in professional ice hockey players. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,119,598
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#619
of 15,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,670
of 234,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#8
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.