↓ Skip to main content

Endothelial dysfunction and preeclampsia: role of oxidative stress

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endothelial dysfunction and preeclampsia: role of oxidative stress
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2014.00372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lissette C. Sánchez-Aranguren, Carlos E. Prada, Carlos E. Riaño-Medina, Marcos Lopez

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is an often fatal pathology characterized by hypertension and proteinuria at the 20th week of gestation that affects 5-10% of the pregnancies. The problem is particularly important in developing countries in where the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is higher and maternal mortality rates are 20 times higher than those reported in developed countries. Risk factors for the development of PE include obesity, insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia that stimulate inflammatory cytokine release and oxidative stress leading to endothelial dysfunction (ED). However, how all these clinical manifestations concur to develop PE is still not very well understood. The related poor trophoblast invasion and uteroplacental artery remodeling described in PE, increases reactive oxygen species (ROS), hypoxia and ED. Here we aim to review current literature from research showing the interplay between oxidative stress, ED and PE to the outcomes of current clinical trials aiming to prevent PE with antioxidant supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 439 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Student > Master 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 56 13%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Postgraduate 33 8%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 115 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 126 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,180,774
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,301
of 13,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,109
of 255,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#27
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.