↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying distortions in two-photon remote focussing microscope images using a volumetric calibration specimen

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying distortions in two-photon remote focussing microscope images using a volumetric calibration specimen
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2014.00384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander D. Corbett, Rebecca A. B. Burton, Gil Bub, Patrick S. Salter, Simon Tuohy, Martin J. Booth, Tony Wilson

Abstract

Remote focussing microscopy allows sharp, in-focus images to be acquired at high speed from outside of the focal plane of an objective lens without any agitation of the specimen. However, without careful optical alignment, the advantages of remote focussing microscopy could be compromised by the introduction of depth-dependent scaling artifacts. To achieve an ideal alignment in a point-scanning remote focussing microscope, the lateral (XY) scan mirror pair must be imaged onto the back focal plane of both the reference and imaging objectives, in a telecentric arrangement. However, for many commercial objective lenses, it can be difficult to accurately locate the position of the back focal plane. This paper investigates the impact of this limitation on the fidelity of three-dimensional data sets of living cardiac tissue, specifically the introduction of distortions. These distortions limit the accuracy of sarcomere measurements taken directly from raw volumetric data. The origin of the distortion is first identified through simulation of a remote focussing microscope. Using a novel three-dimensional calibration specimen it was then possible to quantify experimentally the size of the distortion as a function of objective misalignment. Finally, by first approximating and then compensating the distortion in imaging data from whole heart rodent studies, the variance of sarcomere length (SL) measurements was reduced by almost 50%.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Engineering 8 18%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,238,443
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,333
of 13,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,119
of 255,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#80
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.