↓ Skip to main content

Ca2+ signaling in arterioles and small arteries of conscious, restrained, optical biosensor mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ca2+ signaling in arterioles and small arteries of conscious, restrained, optical biosensor mice
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2014.00387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth T. Fairfax, Joseph R. H. Mauban, Scarlett Hao, Mark A. Rizzo, Jin Zhang, W. Gil Wier

Abstract

Two-photon fluorescence microscopy and conscious, restrained optical biosensor mice were used to study smooth muscle Ca(2+) signaling in ear arterioles. Conscious mice were used in order to preserve normal mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA). ExMLCK mice, which express a genetically-encoded smooth muscle-specific FRET-based Ca(2+) indicator, were equipped with blood pressure telemetry and immobilized for imaging. MAP was 101 ± 4 mmHg in conscious restrained mice, similar to the freely mobile state (107 ± 3 mmHg). Oscillatory vasomotion or irregular contractions were observed in most arterioles (71%), with the greatest oscillatory frequency observed at 0.25 s(-1). In a typical arteriole with an average diameter of ~35 μm, oscillatory vasomotion of a 5-6 μm magnitude was accompanied by nearly uniform [Ca(2+)] oscillations from ~0.1 to 0.5 μM, with maximum [Ca(2+)] occurring immediately before the rapid decrease in diameter. Very rapid, spatially uniform "Ca(2+) flashes" were also observed but not asynchronous propagating Ca(2+) waves. In contrast, vasomotion and dynamic Ca(2+) signals were rarely observed in ear arterioles of anesthetized exMLCK biosensor mice. Hexamethonium (30 μg/g BW, i.p.) caused a fall in MAP to 74 ± 4 mmHg, arteriolar vasodilation, and abolition of vasomotion and synchronous Ca(2+) transients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Mathematics 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,238,443
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,333
of 13,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,925
of 254,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#80
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.