↓ Skip to main content

Individualized medicine and the microbiome in reproductive tract

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individualized medicine and the microbiome in reproductive tract
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea G. Braundmeier, Katherine M. Lenz, Kristin S. Inman, Nicholas Chia, Patricio Jeraldo, Marina R. S. Walther-António, Margret E. Berg Miller, Fang Yang, Douglas J. Creedon, Heidi Nelson, Bryan A. White

Abstract

Humans have evolved along with the millions of microorganisms that populate their bodies. These microbes (10(14)) outnumber human cells by 10 to 1 and account for 3 × 10(6) genes, more than ten times the 25,000 human genes. This microbial metagenome acts as our "other genome" and like our own genes, is unique to the individual. Recent international efforts such as the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) and the MetaHIT Project have helped catalog these microbial genomes using culture-independent, high-throughput, next-generation sequencing. This manuscript will describe recent efforts to define microbial diversity in the female reproductive tract because of the impact that microbial function has on reproductive efficiency. In this review, we will discuss current evidence that microbial communities are critical for maintaining reproductive health and how perturbations of microbial community structures can impact reproductive health from the aspect of infection, reproductive cyclicity, pregnancy, and disease states. Investigations of the human microbiome are propelling interventional strategies from treating medical populations to treating individual patients. In particular, we highlight how understanding and defining microbial community structures in different disease and physiological states have lead to the discovery of biomarkers and, more importantly, the development and implementation of microbial intervention strategies (probiotics) into modern day medicine. Finally this review will conclude with a literature summary of the effectiveness of microbial intervention strategies that have been implemented in animal and human models of disease and the potential for integrating these microbial intervention strategies into standard clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,934,711
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,551
of 15,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,457
of 269,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.