↓ Skip to main content

Renal erythropoietin-producing cells in health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal erythropoietin-producing cells in health and disease
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomokazu Souma, Norio Suzuki, Masayuki Yamamoto

Abstract

Erythropoietin (Epo) is an indispensable erythropoietic hormone primarily produced from renal Epo-producing cells (REPs). Epo production in REPs is tightly regulated in a hypoxia-inducible manner to maintain tissue oxygen homeostasis. Insufficient Epo production by REPs causes renal anemia and anemia associated with chronic disorders. Recent studies have broadened our understanding of REPs from prototypic hypoxia-responsive cells to dynamic fibrogenic cells. In chronic kidney disease, REPs are the major source of scar-forming myofibroblasts and actively produce fibrogenic molecules, including inflammatory cytokines. Notably, myofibroblast-transformed REPs (MF-REPs) recover their original physiological properties after resolution of the disease insults, suggesting that renal anemia and fibrosis could be reversible to some extent. Therefore, understanding the plasticity of REPs will lead to the development of novel targeted therapeutics for both renal fibrosis and anemia. This review summarizes the regulatory mechanisms how hypoxia-inducible Epo gene expression is attained in health and disease conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 36 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,410,971
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,105
of 13,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,827
of 267,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#52
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.