↓ Skip to main content

Two sides of one coin: massive hepatic necrosis and progenitor cell-mediated regeneration in acute liver failure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two sides of one coin: massive hepatic necrosis and progenitor cell-mediated regeneration in acute liver failure
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong-Lei Weng, Xiaobo Cai, Xiaodong Yuan, Roman Liebe, Steven Dooley, Hai Li, Tai-Ling Wang

Abstract

Massive hepatic necrosis is a key event underlying acute liver failure, a serious clinical syndrome with high mortality. Massive hepatic necrosis in acute liver failure has unique pathophysiological characteristics including extremely rapid parenchymal cell death and removal. On the other hand, massive necrosis rapidly induces the activation of liver progenitor cells, the so-called "second pathway of liver regeneration." The final clinical outcome of acute liver failure depends on whether liver progenitor cell-mediated regeneration can efficiently restore parenchymal mass and function within a short time. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding massive hepatic necrosis and liver progenitor cell-mediated regeneration in patients with acute liver failure, the two sides of one coin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,833,677
of 24,293,076 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,808
of 14,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,796
of 243,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#16
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,293,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.