↓ Skip to main content

Bioregulatory systems medicine: an innovative approach to integrating the science of molecular networks, inflammation, and systems biology with the patient's autoregulatory capacity?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioregulatory systems medicine: an innovative approach to integrating the science of molecular networks, inflammation, and systems biology with the patient's autoregulatory capacity?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyssa W. Goldman, Yvonne Burmeister, Konstantin Cesnulevicius, Martha Herbert, Mary Kane, David Lescheid, Timothy McCaffrey, Myron Schultz, Bernd Seilheimer, Alta Smit, Georges St. Laurent, Brian Berman

Abstract

Bioregulatory systems medicine (BrSM) is a paradigm that aims to advance current medical practices. The basic scientific and clinical tenets of this approach embrace an interconnected picture of human health, supported largely by recent advances in systems biology and genomics, and focus on the implications of multi-scale interconnectivity for improving therapeutic approaches to disease. This article introduces the formal incorporation of these scientific and clinical elements into a cohesive theoretical model of the BrSM approach. The authors review this integrated body of knowledge and discuss how the emergent conceptual model offers the medical field a new avenue for extending the armamentarium of current treatment and healthcare, with the ultimate goal of improving population health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 10 12%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,619,942
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,379
of 14,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,203
of 267,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#7
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.