↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic equivalents of task are confounded by adiposity, which disturbs objective measurement of physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic equivalents of task are confounded by adiposity, which disturbs objective measurement of physical activity
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuomo T. Tompuri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,041,169
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,182
of 15,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,132
of 277,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.