↓ Skip to main content

Vaginal biogenic amines: biomarkers of bacterial vaginosis or precursors to vaginal dysbiosis?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vaginal biogenic amines: biomarkers of bacterial vaginosis or precursors to vaginal dysbiosis?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiffanie M. Nelson, Joanna-Lynn C. Borgogna, Rebecca M. Brotman, Jacques Ravel, Seth T. Walk, Carl J. Yeoman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 14%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,278,538
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,823
of 15,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,462
of 286,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#22
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.