You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Satellite cells in human skeletal muscle plasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2015.00283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Snijders, Joshua P. Nederveen, Bryon R. McKay, Sophie Joanisse, Lex B. Verdijk, Luc J. C. van Loon, Gianni Parise |
| Abstract |
Skeletal muscle satellite cells are considered to play a crucial role in muscle fiber maintenance, repair and remodeling. Our knowledge of the role of satellite cells in muscle fiber adaptation has traditionally relied on in vitro cell and in vivo animal models. Over the past decade, a genuine effort has been made to translate these results to humans under physiological conditions. Findings from in vivo human studies suggest that satellite cells play a key role in skeletal muscle fiber repair/remodeling in response to exercise. Mounting evidence indicates that aging has a profound impact on the regulation of satellite cells in human skeletal muscle. Yet, the precise role of satellite cells in the development of muscle fiber atrophy with age remains unresolved. This review seeks to integrate recent results from in vivo human studies on satellite cell function in muscle fiber repair/remodeling in the wider context of satellite cell biology whose literature is largely based on animal and cell models. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 575 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 103 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 14% |
| Researcher | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 13% |
| Unknown | 135 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 121 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 76 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 71 | 12% |
| Unknown | 156 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,073,835
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#578
of 14,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,991
of 284,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#4
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.