↓ Skip to main content

Flight control and landing precision in the nocturnal bee Megalopta is robust to large changes in light intensity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flight control and landing precision in the nocturnal bee Megalopta is robust to large changes in light intensity
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Baird, Diana C. Fernandez, William T. Wcislo, Eric J. Warrant

Abstract

Like their diurnal relatives, Megalopta genalis use visual information to control flight. Unlike their diurnal relatives, however, they do this at extremely low light intensities. Although Megalopta has developed optical specializations to increase visual sensitivity, theoretical studies suggest that this enhanced sensitivity does not enable them to capture enough light to use visual information to reliably control flight in the rainforest at night. It has been proposed that Megalopta gain extra sensitivity by summing visual information over time. While enhancing the reliability of vision, this strategy would decrease the accuracy with which they can detect image motion-a crucial cue for flight control. Here, we test this temporal summation hypothesis by investigating how Megalopta's flight control and landing precision is affected by light intensity and compare our findings with the results of similar experiments performed on the diurnal bumblebee Bombus terrestris, to explore the extent to which Megalopta's adaptations to dim light affect their precision. We find that, unlike Bombus, light intensity does not affect flight and landing precision in Megalopta. Overall, we find little evidence that Megalopta uses a temporal summation strategy in dim light, while we find strong support for the use of this strategy in Bombus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 48%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,066,248
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,075
of 13,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,321
of 284,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#20
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.