↓ Skip to main content

Calcium-Sensing Receptor: A Key Target for Extracellular Calcium Signaling in Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcium-Sensing Receptor: A Key Target for Extracellular Calcium Signaling in Neurons
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2016.00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian L. Jones, Stephen M. Smith

Abstract

Though both clinicians and scientists have long recognized the influence of extracellular calcium on the function of muscle and nervous tissue, recent insights reveal that the mechanisms allowing changes in extracellular calcium to alter cellular excitability have been incompletely understood. For many years the effects of calcium on neuronal signaling were explained only in terms of calcium entry through voltage-gated calcium channels and biophysical charge screening. More recently however, it has been recognized that the calcium-sensing receptor is prevalent in the nervous system and regulates synaptic transmission and neuronal activity via multiple signaling pathways. Here we review the multiplicity of mechanisms by which changes in extracellular calcium alter neuronal signaling and propose that multiple mechanisms are required to describe the full range of experimental observations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Neuroscience 15 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,372,357
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,996
of 13,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,429
of 301,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#38
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.