You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Repeated Sprint Ability in Young Basketball Players: Multi-direction vs. One-Change of Direction (Part 1)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2016.00133 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johnny Padulo, Nicola L. Bragazzi, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, Antonio Dello Iacono, Giuseppe Attene, Fabio Pizzolato, Juliano Dal Pupo, Alessandro M. Zagatto, Marcello Oggianu, Gian M. Migliaccio |
| Abstract |
The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability of a novel multi-direction repeated sprint ability (RSA) test [RSM; 10 × (6 × 5-m)] compared with a RSA with one change of direction [10 × (2 × 15-m)], and the relationship of the RSM and RSA with Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) and jump performances [squat jump (SJ) and counter-movement-jump (CMJ)]. Thirty-six (male, n = 14, female n = 22) young basketball players (age 16.0 ± 0.9 yrs) performed the RSM, RSA, Yo-Yo IR1, SJ, and CMJ, and were re-tested only for RSM and RSA after 1 week. The absolute error of reliability (standard error of the measurement) was lower than 0.212 and 0.617-s for the time variables of the RSA and RSM test, respectively. Performance in the RSA and RSM test significantly correlated with CMJ and SJ. The best time, worst time, and total time of the RSA and RSM test were negatively correlated with Yo-Yo IR1 distance. Based on these findings, consistent with previously published studies, it was concluded that the novel RSM test was valid and reliable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 72 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,703,954
of 25,050,563 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,885
of 15,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,688
of 305,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#48
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,050,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.