↓ Skip to main content

“Decoding” Angiogenesis: New Facets Controlling Endothelial Cell Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Decoding” Angiogenesis: New Facets Controlling Endothelial Cell Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2016.00306
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raj Sewduth, Massimo M. Santoro

Abstract

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is a unique and crucial biological process occurring during both development and adulthood. A better understanding of the mechanisms that regulates such process is mandatory to intervene in pathophysiological conditions. Here we highlight some recent argument on new players that are critical in endothelial cells, by summarizing novel discoveries that regulate notorious vascular pathways such as Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Notch and Planar Cell Polarity (PCP), and by discussing more recent findings that put metabolism, redox signaling and hemodynamic forces as novel unforeseen facets in angiogenesis. These new aspects, that critically regulate angiogenesis and vascular homeostasis in health and diseased, represent unforeseen new ground to develop anti-angiogenic therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Engineering 5 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 28 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,288,900
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,223
of 15,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,116
of 373,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#23
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.