You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitochondrial Quality Control in Cardiac Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2016.00479 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliane C. Campos, Luiz H. M. Bozi, Luiz R. G. Bechara, Vanessa M. Lima, Julio C. B. Ferreira |
| Abstract |
Disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis is a hallmark of cardiac diseases. Therefore, maintenance of mitochondrial integrity through different surveillance mechanisms is critical for cardiomyocyte survival. In this review, we discuss the most recent findings on the central role of mitochondrial quality control processes including regulation of mitochondrial redox balance, aldehyde metabolism, proteostasis, dynamics, and clearance in cardiac diseases, highlighting their potential as therapeutic targets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,732,471
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,612
of 14,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,301
of 317,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#45
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.