↓ Skip to main content

Redox Mechanism of Reactive Oxygen Species in Exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redox Mechanism of Reactive Oxygen Species in Exercise
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2016.00486
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng He, Juan Li, Zewen Liu, Chia-Chen Chuang, Wenge Yang, Li Zuo

Abstract

It is well known that regular exercise can benefit health by enhancing antioxidant defenses in the body. However, unaccustomed and/or exhaustive exercise can generate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress-related tissue damages and impaired muscle contractility. ROS are produced in both aerobic and anaerobic exercise. Mitochondria, NADPH oxidases and xanthine oxidases have all been identified as potential contributors to ROS production, yet the exact redox mechanisms underlying exercise-induced oxidative stress remain elusive. Interestingly, moderate exposure to ROS is necessary to induce body's adaptive responses such as the activation of antioxidant defense mechanisms. Dietary antioxidant manipulation can also reduce ROS levels and muscle fatigue, as well as enhance exercise recovery. To elucidate the complex role of ROS in exercise, this review updates on new findings of ROS origins within skeletal muscles associated with various types of exercises such as endurance, sprint and mountain climbing. In addition, we will examine the corresponding antioxidant defense systems as well as dietary manipulation against damages caused by ROS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 412 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 14%
Student > Master 57 14%
Researcher 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 118 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 75 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 4%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 136 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,448,723
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,292
of 15,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,618
of 319,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#38
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.