You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inflammatory Cytokines and BDNF Response to High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise: Effect the Exercise Volume
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2016.00509 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Cabral-Santos, Carlos I. M. Castrillón, Rodolfo A. T. Miranda, Paula A. Monteiro, Daniela S. Inoue, Eduardo Z. Campos, Peter Hofmann, Fábio S. Lira |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two similar high-intensity intermittent exercises (HIIE) but different volume 1.25 km (HIIE1.25) and 2.5 km (HIIE2.5) on inflammatory and BDNF responses. Ten physically active male subjects (age 25.22 ± 1.74 years, body mass 78.98 ± 7.31 kg, height 1.78 ± 0.06 m, VO2peak 59.94 ± 9.38 ml·kg·min(-1)) performed an incremental treadmill exercise test and randomly completed two sessions of HIIE on a treadmill (1:1 min at vVO2max with passive recovery). Blood samples were collected at rest, immediately and 60-min after the exercise sessions. Serum was analyzed for glucose, lactate, IL-6, IL-10, and BDNF levels. Blood lactate concentrations was higher immediately post-exercise compared to rest (HIIE1.25: 1.69 ± 0.26-7.78 ± 2.09 mmol·L(-1), and HIIE2.5: 1.89 ± 0.26-7.38 ± 2.57 mmol·L(-1), p < 0.0001). Glucose concentrations did not present changes under the different conditions, however, levels were higher 60-min post-exercise than at rest only in the HIIE1.25 condition (rest: 76.80 ± 11.14-97.84 ± 24.87 mg·dL(-1), p < 0.05). BDNF level increased immediately after exercise in both protocols (HIIE1.25: 9.71 ± 306-17.86 ± 8.59 ng.mL(-1), and HIIE2.5: 11.83 ± 5.82-22.84 ± 10.30 ng.mL(-1)). Although both exercises increased IL-6, level percent between rest and immediately after exercise was higher in the HIIE2.5 than HIIE1.25 (30 and 10%; p = 0.014, respectively). Moreover, IL-10 levels percent increase between immediately and 60-min post-exercise was higher in HIIE2.5 than HIIE1.25 (37 and 10%; p = 0.012, respectively). In conclusion, both HIIE protocols with the same intensity were effective to increase BDNF and IL-6 levels immediately after exercise while only IL-10 response was related to the durantion of exercise indicanting the importance of this exercise prescription variable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Brazil | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,354,457
of 25,149,126 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,831
of 15,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,047
of 318,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#30
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,149,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.