↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of Critical Power and W′ in Hypoxia: Application to Work-Balance Modelling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prediction of Critical Power and W′ in Hypoxia: Application to Work-Balance Modelling
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan E. Townsend, David S. Nichols, Philip F. Skiba, Sebastien Racinais, Julien D. Périard

Abstract

Purpose: Develop a prediction equation for critical power (CP) and work above CP (W') in hypoxia for use in the work-balance ([Formula: see text]) model. Methods: Nine trained male cyclists completed cycling time trials (TT; 12, 7, and 3 min) to determine CP and W' at five altitudes (250, 1,250, 2,250, 3,250, and 4,250 m). Least squares regression was used to predict CP and W' at altitude. A high-intensity intermittent test (HIIT) was performed at 250 and 2,250 m. Actual and predicted CP and W' were used to compute W' during HIIT using differential ([Formula: see text]) and integral ([Formula: see text]) forms of the [Formula: see text] model. Results: CP decreased at altitude (P < 0.001) as described by 3rd order polynomial function (R(2) = 0.99). W' decreased at 4,250 m only (P < 0.001). A double-linear function characterized the effect of altitude on W' (R(2) = 0.99). There was no significant effect of parameter input (actual vs. predicted CP and W') on modelled [Formula: see text] at 2,250 m (P = 0.24). [Formula: see text] returned higher values than [Formula: see text] throughout HIIT (P < 0.001). During HIIT, [Formula: see text] was not different to 0 kJ at completion, at 250 m (0.7 ± 2.0 kJ; P = 0.33) and 2,250 m (-1.3 ± 3.5 kJ; P = 0.30). However, [Formula: see text] was lower than 0 kJ at 250 m (-0.9 ± 1.3 kJ; P = 0.058) and 2,250 m (-2.8 ± 2.8 kJ; P = 0.02). Conclusion: The altitude prediction equations for CP and W' developed in this study are suitable for use with the [Formula: see text] model in acute hypoxia. This enables the application of [Formula: see text] modelling to training prescription and competition analysis at altitude.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 82 59%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,137,048
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#629
of 15,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,541
of 315,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#16
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.