↓ Skip to main content

Application of Stem Cells in Oral Disease Therapy: Progresses and Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of Stem Cells in Oral Disease Therapy: Progresses and Perspectives
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Yang, Yi Qiu, Niu Zhou, Hong Ouyang, Junjun Ding, Bin Cheng, Jianbo Sun

Abstract

Stem cells are undifferentiated and pluripotent cells that can differentiate into specialized cells with a more specific function. Stem cell therapies become preferred methods for the treatment of multiple diseases. Oral and maxillofacial defect is one kind of the diseases that could be most possibly cured by stem cell therapies. Here we discussed oral diseases, oral adult stem cells, iPS cells, and the progresses/challenges/perspectives of application of stem cells for oral disease treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 54 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 58 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,451,425
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,597
of 14,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,277
of 309,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#67
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.