Title |
Time Spent Sitting Is Associated with Changes in Biomarkers of Frailty in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cross Sectional Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2017.00505 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jair S. Virtuoso Júnior, Liliane B. Roza, Sheilla Tribess, Joilson Meneguci, Edmar L. Mendes, Maycon S. Pegorari, Flávia A. Dias, Darlene M. dos Santos Tavares, Jeffer E. Sasaki |
Abstract |
Background: Sedentary behavior has gained prominence in the literature as a risk factor for health and mortality independent of physical activity level; however, little is known about the relationship of sedentary behavior with frailty in older adults. The aim of this study was to investigate if time spent sitting can be used as a discriminator of frailty in older hospitalized persons. Methods: The study included 162 hospitalized inpatients aged ≥60 years. Blood samples were taken for analyzing leukocyte counts and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP). Participants also answered a questionnaire about time spent sitting. Frailty was determined from a combination of CRP concentration and leukocyte count. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to analyse the predictive power and cut-points for time spent sitting and the presence of frailty. Results: The areas under the ROC curves indicated that time spent sitting was an independent indicator of frailty (area under curve >0.6). The cut-off points for time spent sitting as an indicator of frailty were >257 min/day for men and >330 min/day for women. Conclusions: Time spent sitting is associated with biomarkers of frailty in persons aged ≥60 years, indicating a need for interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behavior in this age group. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 55% |
France | 1 | 9% |
Sweden | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 41% |