↓ Skip to main content

NLRP3 Inflammasome as a Molecular Marker in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NLRP3 Inflammasome as a Molecular Marker in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beibei Luo, Feng Huang, Yanli Liu, Yiying Liang, Zhe Wei, Honghong Ke, Zhiyu Zeng, Weiqiang Huang, Yan He

Abstract

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), a common consequence of longstanding diabetes mellitus, is initiated by death of cardiomyocyte. Hyperglycemia-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction is a major contributor of the chronic low-grade inflammation that characterizes as the DCM. ROS may promote the activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain like receptor (NLR) pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, a novel regulator of inflammation and cell death, by nuclear factor-kB (NF-κB) and thioredoxin interacting/inhibiting protein (TXNIP). NLRP3 inflammasome regulates the death of cardiomyocyte and activation of fibroblast in DCM, which is involved in the structural and functional disorder of DCM. However, comprehensive understanding of molecular mechanisms linking NLRP3 inflammasome and disorder of cardiomyocyte and fibroblast in DCM is lacking. Here, we review the molecular mechanism(s) of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in response to hyperglycemia in DCM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,438,227
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,466
of 13,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,726
of 316,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#203
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.