↓ Skip to main content

“You're Only as Strong as Your Weakest Link”: A Current Opinion about the Concepts and Characteristics of Functional Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“You're Only as Strong as Your Weakest Link”: A Current Opinion about the Concepts and Characteristics of Functional Training
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cauê V. La Scala Teixeira, Alexandre L. Evangelista, Jefferson S. Novaes, Marzo E. Da Silva Grigoletto, David G. Behm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 20%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 45 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 42 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,263,351
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,717
of 15,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,893
of 324,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#45
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.