↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: G-CSF does not influence C2C12 myogenesis despite receptor expression in healthy and dystrophic skeletal muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: G-CSF does not influence C2C12 myogenesis despite receptor expression in healthy and dystrophic skeletal muscle
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00886
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig R. Wright, Erin L. Brown, Paul A. Della-Gatta, Alister C. Ward, Gordon S. Lynch, Aaron P. Russell

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 170 in vol. 5, PMID: 24822049.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,823,812
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,410
of 14,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,721
of 329,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#216
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.