You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Case for Adopting a Multivariate Approach to Optimize Training Load Quantification in Team Sports
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2017.01024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dan Weaving, Ben Jones, Kevin Till, Grant Abt, Clive Beggs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 40% |
| Australia | 6 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Morocco | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 53% |
| Scientists | 23 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 53 | 51% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,075,831
of 24,077,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#581
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,572
of 446,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#24
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.