↓ Skip to main content

Peak Velocity as an Alternative Method for Training Prescription in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peak Velocity as an Alternative Method for Training Prescription in Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline de Carvalho Picoli, Paulo Vitor da Silva Romero, Gustavo R. Gilio, Débora A. Guariglia, Laize P. Tófolo, Solange M. F. de Moraes, Fabiana A. Machado, Sidney B. Peres

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficiency of an aerobic physical training program prescribed according to either velocity associated with maximum oxygen uptake (vVO2max) or peak running speed obtained during an incremental treadmill test (Vpeak_K) in mice.Methods:Twenty male Swiss mice, 60 days old, were randomly divided into two groups with 10 animals each: 1. group trained by vVO2max(GVO2), 2. group trained by Vpeak_K(GVP). After the adaptation training period, an incremental test was performed at the beginning of each week to adjust training load and to determine the amount of VO2and VCO2fluxes consumed, energy expenditure (EE) and run distance during the incremental test. Mice were submitted to 4 weeks of aerobic exercise training of moderate intensity (velocity referring to 70% of vVO2maxand Vpeak_K) in a programmable treadmill. The sessions lasted from 30 to 40 min in the first week, to reach 60 min in the fourth week, in order to provide the mice with a moderate intensity exercise, totaling 20 training sessions.Results:Mice demonstrated increases in VO2max(ml·kg-1·min-1) (GVO2= 49.1% and GVP = 56.2%), Vpeak_K(cm·s-1) (GVO2= 50.9% and GVP = 22.3%), EE (ml·kg-0,75·min-1) (GVO2= 39.9% and GVP = 51.5%), and run distance (cm) (GVO2= 43.5% and GVP = 33.4%), after 4 weeks of aerobic training (time effect,P< 0.05); there were no differences between the groups.Conclusions:Vpeak_K, as well as vVO2max, can be adopted as an alternative test to determine the performance and correct prescription of systemized aerobic protocol training to mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,374,920
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,335
of 13,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,132
of 437,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#130
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.