↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac Arrhythmias and Antiarrhythmic Drugs: An Autophagic Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Antiarrhythmic Drugs: An Autophagic Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne J. A. van Bavel, Marc A. Vos, Marcel A. G. van der Heyden

Abstract

Degradation of cellular material by lysosomes is known as autophagy, and its main function is to maintain cellular homeostasis for growth, proliferation and survival of the cell. In recent years, research has focused on the characterization of autophagy pathways. Targeting of autophagy mediators has been described predominantly in cancer treatment, but also in neurological and cardiovascular diseases. Although the number of studies is still limited, there are indications that activity of autophagy pathways increases under arrhythmic conditions. Moreover, an increasing number of antiarrhythmic and non-cardiac drugs are found to affect autophagy pathways. We, therefore, suggest that future work should recognize the largely unaddressed effects of antiarrhythmic agents and other classes of drugs on autophagy pathway activation and inhibition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,340,245
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,443
of 15,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,011
of 344,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#89
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.