You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.00403 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivier Dupuy, Wafa Douzi, Dimitri Theurot, Laurent Bosquet, Benoit Dugué |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 410 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 9% |
| Japan | 36 | 9% |
| Spain | 14 | 3% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| France | 10 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 44 | 11% |
| Unknown | 187 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 324 | 79% |
| Scientists | 52 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1281 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 217 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 159 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 7% |
| Researcher | 76 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 5% |
| Other | 201 | 16% |
| Unknown | 472 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 373 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 139 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 90 | 7% |
| Unknown | 504 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1052. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,187
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5
of 15,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291
of 340,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#1
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.