↓ Skip to main content

Classifying Cardiac Actin Mutations Associated With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classifying Cardiac Actin Mutations Associated With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan A. Despond, John F. Dawson

Abstract

Mutations in the cardiac actin gene (ACTC1) are associated with the development of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). To date, 12 different ACTC1 mutations have been discovered in patients with HCM. Given the high degree of sequence conservation of actin proteins and the range of protein-protein interactions actin participates in, mutations in cardiac actin leading to HCM are particularly interesting. Here, we suggest the classification of ACTC1 mutations based on the location of the resulting amino acid change in actin into three main groups: (1) those affecting only the binding site of the myosin molecular motor, termed M-class mutations, (2) those affecting only the binding site of the tropomyosin (Tm) regulatory protein, designated T-class mutations, and (3) those affecting both the myosin- and Tm-binding sites, called MT-class mutations. To understand the precise pathogenesis of cardiac actin mutations and develop treatments specific to the molecular cause of disease, we need to integrate rapidly growing structural information with studies of regulated actomyosin systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 30 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,831,373
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,934
of 13,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,135
of 326,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#163
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.