↓ Skip to main content

Transient Increase in Cortical Excitability Following Static Stretching of Plantar Flexor Muscles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transient Increase in Cortical Excitability Following Static Stretching of Plantar Flexor Muscles
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Budini, Monica Christova, Eugen Gallasch, Paul Kressnik, Dietmar Rafolt, Markus Tilp

Abstract

Spinal excitability in humans is inhibited by both passively holding a static position with the muscle lengthened (static stretching) and by a single non-active lengthening movement. However, whilst immediately after a passive lengthening movement the inhibition persists for several seconds, there seem to be an immediate recovery following static stretching. This result is counter intuitive and could be attributed to methodological procedures. Indeed, differently to what has been done until now, in order to study whether static stretching has a transient effect on the neuromuscular pathway, the procedure should be repeated many times and measurements collected at different time points after stretching. In the present study we repeated 60 times 30 s static stretching of ankle plantar flexors and measured tap reflex (T-reflex), Hoffman reflex (H-reflex), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the Soleus muscle at several time points, starting from immediately after until 30 s following the procedure. T-reflex was strongly inhibited (range 31-91%, p = 0.005) and the inhibition persisted for 30 s showing a slow recovery (r = 0.541, p = 0.037). H-reflex was not affected by the procedure. Stretching increased the size of the MEPs (p < 0.0001), differences at times 0 and 2 s after stretching (p = 0.015 and p = 0.047, respectively). These results confirm that static stretching reduces muscle spindle sensitivity. Moreover it is suggested that post-activation depression of Ia afferents, which is commonly considered the cause of H-reflex depression during both dorsiflexion and static stretching, vanished immediately following stretching or is counteracted by an increased corticospinal excitability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 8 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,790
of 13,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,768
of 328,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#275
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.