↓ Skip to main content

Neuro-Cardio Mechanisms in Huntington’s Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuro-Cardio Mechanisms in Huntington’s Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethan J. Critchley, Mark Isalan, Michal Mielcarek

Abstract

Although Huntington's disease is generally considered to be a neurological disorder, there is mounting evidence that heart malfunction plays an important role in disease progression. This is perhaps not unexpected since both cardiovascular and nervous systems are strongly connected - both developmentally and subsequently in health and disease. This connection occurs through a system of central and peripheral neurons that control cardiovascular performance, while in return the cardiovascular system works as a sensor for the nervous system to react to physiological events. Hence, given their permanent interconnectivity, any pathological events occurring in one system might affect the second. In addition, some pathological signals from Huntington's disease might occur simultaneously in both the cardiovascular and nervous systems, since mutant huntingtin protein is expressed in both. Here we aim to review the source of HD-related cardiomyopathy in the light of recently published studies, and to identify similarities between HD-related cardiomyopathy and other neuro-cardio disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Neuroscience 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,181,538
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,589
of 15,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,826
of 336,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#113
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.