↓ Skip to main content

Alteration in Brain Functional and Effective Connectivity in Subjects With Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alteration in Brain Functional and Effective Connectivity in Subjects With Hypertension
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingguo Bu, Congcong Huo, Gongcheng Xu, Ying Liu, Zengyong Li, Yubo Fan, Jianfeng Li

Abstract

To reveal the physiological mechanism of the cognitive decline in subjects with hypertension, the functional connectivity (FC) was assessed by using the wavelet phase coherence (WPCO), and effective connectivity (EC) was assessed by using the coupling strength (CS) of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signals. NIRS signals were continuously recorded from the prefrontal cortex, sensorimotor cortex, and occipital lobes of 13 hypertensive patients (hypertension group, 70 ± 6.5 years old) and 16 elderly healthy subjects (control group, 71 ± 5.5 years old) in resting and standing periods. WPCO and CS were calculated in four frequency intervals: I, 0.6-2; II, 0.145-0.6; III, 0.052-0.145; and IV, 0.021-0.052 Hz. CS quantifies coupling amplitude. In comparison with the control group, the hypertension group showed significantly decreased (p < 0.05) WPCO and CS in intervals III and IV and in the resting and standing states. WPCO and CS were significantly decreased in the resting state compared with those in the standing state in the hypertension group (p < 0.05). Decreased WPCO and CS indicated a reduced network interaction, suggesting disturbed neurovascular coupling in subjects with hypertension. Compared with the control group, the hypertension group showed significantly lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p = 0.028) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (p = 0.011). In the hypertension group, correlation analysis showed that WPCO and CS were significantly positively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores, respectively. These findings may provide evidence of impaired cognitive function in hypertension and can enhance the understanding on neurovascular coupling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Psychology 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,640,437
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,267
of 13,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,928
of 331,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#330
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.