↓ Skip to main content

Higher Training Frequency Is Important for Gaining Muscular Strength Under Volume-Matched Training

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
170 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
20 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Higher Training Frequency Is Important for Gaining Muscular Strength Under Volume-Matched Training
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eisuke Ochi, Masataka Maruo, Yosuke Tsuchiya, Naokata Ishii, Koji Miura, Kazushige Sasaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 170 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 19%
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 49 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 51 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 55 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#273,477
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#145
of 15,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,821
of 342,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.