You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Maximum Lyapunov Exponent During Walking and Running: Reliability Assessment of Different Marker-Sets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonis Ekizos, Alessandro Santuz, Arno Schroll, Adamantios Arampatzis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#12,813,320
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,903
of 13,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,333
of 334,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#176
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.