↓ Skip to main content

Superior Intrinsic Mitochondrial Respiration in Women Than in Men

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
101 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Superior Intrinsic Mitochondrial Respiration in Women Than in Men
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele A. Cardinale, Filip J. Larsen, Tomas A. Schiffer, David Morales-Alamo, Björn Ekblom, Jose A. L. Calbet, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Robert Boushel

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is apparent in humans, however, to date no studies have investigated mitochondrial function focusing on intrinsic mitochondrial respiration (i.e., mitochondrial respiration for a given amount of mitochondrial protein) and mitochondrial oxygen affinity (p50mito) in relation to biological sex in human. A skeletal muscle biopsy was donated by nine active women, and ten men matched for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and by nine endurance trained men. Intrinsic mitochondrial respiration, assessed in isolated mitochondria, was higher in women compared to men when activating complex I (CIP) and complex I+II (CI+IIP) (p < 0.05), and was similar to trained men (CIP, p = 0.053; CI+IIP, p = 0.066). Proton leak and p50mito were higher in women compared to men independent of VO2max. In conclusion, significant novel differences in mitochondrial oxidative function, intrinsic mitochondrial respiration and p50mito exist between women and men. These findings may represent an adaptation in the oxygen cascade in women to optimize muscle oxygen uptake to compensate for a lower oxygen delivery during exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#635,706
of 26,078,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#332
of 15,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,160
of 344,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#14
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,078,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.