You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation and Opportunities of Electrocardiographic Imaging: From Technical Achievements to Clinical Applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01305 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthijs Cluitmans, Dana H. Brooks, Rob MacLeod, Olaf Dössel, María S. Guillem, Peter M. van Dam, Jana Svehlikova, Bin He, John Sapp, Linwei Wang, Laura Bear |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 25% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 26 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,963,280
of 24,529,782 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,694
of 15,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,918
of 346,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#111
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,529,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.