You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ESS: A Tool for Genome-Scale Quantification of Essentiality Score for Reaction/Genes in Constraint-Based Modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01355 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheng Zhang, Gholamreza Bidkhori, Rui Benfeitas, Sunjae Lee, Muhammad Arif, Mathias Uhlén, Adil Mardinoglu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,656,614
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,977
of 15,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,625
of 352,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#80
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.