↓ Skip to main content

Model-Supported Radiotherapy Personalization: In silico Test of Hyper- and Hypo-Fractionation Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Model-Supported Radiotherapy Personalization: In silico Test of Hyper- and Hypo-Fractionation Effects
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01445
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonella Belfatto, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Guido Baroni, Pietro Cerveri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 24%
Computer Science 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,652,743
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,272
of 13,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,303
of 348,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#277
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.