↓ Skip to main content

Sex Differences in the Temporal Recovery of Neuromuscular Function Following Resistance Training in Resistance Trained Men and Women 18 to 35 Years

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex Differences in the Temporal Recovery of Neuromuscular Function Following Resistance Training in Resistance Trained Men and Women 18 to 35 Years
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Davies, Brian P. Carson, Philip M. Jakeman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 47 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 39 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 52 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,982,133
of 24,791,202 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,096
of 15,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,585
of 356,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#45
of 462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,791,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.