You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Sprint Interval Training on Anthropometric Measures and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Healthy Young Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01738 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
João Pedro A. Naves, Ricardo B. Viana, Ana Cristina S. Rebelo, Claudio Andre B. de Lira, Gustavo D. Pimentel, Patrícia Cristina B. Lobo, Jordana C. de Oliveira, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Paulo Gentil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| Iceland | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 70 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,638,489
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#902
of 15,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,269
of 448,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#34
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.