↓ Skip to main content

Dyadic Plasticity in Cardiomyocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dyadic Plasticity in Cardiomyocytes
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01773
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter P. Jones, Niall MacQuaide, William E. Louch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,163,603
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,851
of 14,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,251
of 438,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#203
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.