You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personalization of Logical Models With Multi-Omics Data Allows Clinical Stratification of Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01965 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonas Béal, Arnau Montagud, Pauline Traynard, Emmanuel Barillot, Laurence Calzone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,970,644
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,711
of 14,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,939
of 445,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#92
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.