You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multi-Center Comparison of O2peak Trainability Between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camilla J. Williams, Brendon J. Gurd, Jacob T. Bonafiglia, Sarah Voisin, Zhixiu Li, Nicholas Harvey, Ilaria Croci, Jenna L. Taylor, Trishan Gajanand, Joyce S. Ramos, Robert G. Fassett, Jonathan P. Little, Monique E. Francois, Christopher M. Hearon, Satyam Sarma, Sylvan L.J.E. Janssen, Emeline M. Van Craenenbroeck, Paul Beckers, Véronique A. Cornelissen, Nele Pattyn, Erin J. Howden, Shelley E. Keating, Anja Bye, Dorthe Stensvold, Ulrik Wisloff, Ioannis Papadimitriou, Xu Yan, David J. Bishop, Nir Eynon, Jeff S. Coombes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 10% |
| Spain | 14 | 10% |
| Brazil | 8 | 6% |
| Australia | 8 | 6% |
| Norway | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Chile | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 66% |
| Scientists | 35 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 50 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 71 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#518,380
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#280
of 15,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,921
of 452,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#15
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.